Home

News

Weird

Ford Falcon V8 Duels Two-Cylinder Fiat 126 In Fuel Economy Test

It's Ford vs. Fiat in a battle of the least.

Ford Falcon V8 Vs Fiat Two Cylinder Race

10:41

Mark Webb Mark Webb

By: Mark Webb

Jan 14, 2023 at 6:08pm ET

Add Motor1.com as a preferred source in Google

Share

Comment

When it comes to fuel economy, there's a debate about engine size vs. engine speed. Is it better to have a bigger engine turning low RPMs or a small engine revving its heart out? Recently, the Garbage Time YouTube channel attempted to answer that age-old fuel consumption question while trying to consume 10 minutes of your time. 

The video features a 1996 Ford Falcon and a 1991 FSM Niki, a revised version of the Fiat 126 sold in Australia from 1989 to 1992. With the air conditioning on, the Falcon burns 15.7 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers, the equivalent of about 15 mpg. As for the Niki, it doesn't have air conditioning. We're also not really sure what kind of gas mileage it gets because it keeps breaking down. But with a tiny 650cc two-cylinder engine and a 1,300 lb curb weight, the Niki should thrash the Falcon in a battle of the least. If it stays running. 

The race is simple, drive 100 km over a mixture of roads while keeping up with traffic. The Falcon cruises serenely, barely cracking 1,800 rpm. It never breaks a sweat, even on the highway, easily keeping up with traffic.

According to Garbage Time, driving the Niki flat out is like being in a "caged motorcycle" or a "wheelbarrow for humans." Far from powerful, its two-cylinder engine thrashes just to maintain speed on the highway, struggling valiantly to reach the speed limit, before settling back to 80 km/h (50 mph).  

What do you think?

View

Comments

Ultimately the race ends, and the fuel economy scores are tallied. The Falcon manages a respectable 10.77 liters per 100 km or almost 22 mpg. Running flat out most of the time, the Niki burned 5.6 liters per 100 km, the equivalent of 42 mpg.   

More Oddball Slow Races:

This Three-Wheeler Drag Race Is Miserably Slow Yet Fun To Watch

Downhill Power Wheels Race Looks Absolutely Savage

As for who truly wins, it may come down to your preference. Would you rather spend more on gas to get somewhere comfortably? Or, are you the kind of person who goes the cheapest route possible or enjoys the sensation of driving a slow car fast? 

Source: Garbage Time via Youtube

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Motor1.com?

Take our 3 minute survey.

- The Motor1.com Team

Share this Story

GO TO COMMENTS

(

)

Got a tip for us? Email: tips@motor1.com

View all comments ( )

Popular

Forget The Sedan: This Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio Is A Two-Seat Convertible

Forget The Sedan: This Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio Is A Two-Seat Convertible

BMW's First Electric 3 Series Wagon Spied Looking Nearly Ready For Production

BMW's First Electric 3 Series Wagon Spied Looking Nearly Ready For Production

Fiat's Weird Multipla Revival Could Actually Reach Production

Fiat's Weird Multipla Revival Could Actually Reach Production

EU Moves Closer To Keeping Gas Cars Alive After 2035. Here's What's Changed

EU Moves Closer To Keeping Gas Cars Alive After 2035. Here's What's Changed

latest articles

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU



BMW Kept This Hatchback A Secret For Decades



BMW's First Electric 3 Series Wagon Spied Looking Nearly Ready For Production



Renault's Cheerful Twingo EV Gets A Weird Glass Roof



Honda Might Bring A Rugged TrailSport Trim To Its Smallest SUV



Mazda's Electric SUV Lets You Shout Profanities Through Its Front Speaker



'Literally STEALING': Ford Driver Told He Needs Thousands In Suspension Work At Dealership. It's An All-Too-Common Trick



Watch Toyota Drop A Caravan On The Electric Hilux To Revive Top Gear Stunt